Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal.

Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision In the second-round review after major revisions, as informed by the assistant editor, the reviewer agreed for the first and second-round reviews didn’t submit the second-round review report in a period of nearly two weeks, which is quite rare based on our experience. ’ Also, the Editorial Office Assistant (EOA) is different from the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) that I had before. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. For all subsequent steps, please check Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance. There is a contradiction in your statements. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" after a month. After 5 months I received a "Major revision". 4. This change has occurred I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. :-) Incidentally, we wonder what would have happened with the earlier submission, although it was a while ago. The submission is now with the author. Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. I answered all the reviewers and resubmitted the article. You must have received positive reviews. or does the editor might assign new reviewers to evaluate Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. Major Revision: The manuscript may be accepted with major revisions. What does it mean? The article will be handled by new editor? Or the editor is making final decision based on our revised I have revised the manuscript two times: the first major revision and the second minor revision. This change has occurred If accepted, the paper is sent to production. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. The reviewers usually take 1-2 months to review a submission, but some papers may take longer, e. I was wondering about the The main exception to this is if the other referees already provided sufficient reviews at this point. Ndzana Georges. Ditolak 2. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. Reject (without further consideration) The guideline for each recommendation option is described below. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. " Does this Like reviewers gave low scores and it is bound for rejection? b) For ex: Let's say the paper requires some revision based on reviewers. Author submits revisions, if applicable. Please note that manuscripts should not be unsubmitted after reviewers have been invited. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon request, for more information see Can I have extension to submit my revision? Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point Accept with Minor Revision. This change has occurred Hello, I would like to ask, after submitting a minor revision, will the status "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" still appear? 晗堡包 2021-11-15 EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. g. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. Reviewer assignments (i. Hi Amal – welcome back to the forum! This question seems on similar lines to your earlier query, though the difference is that there, things moved to ‘Ready for Decision’ quite quickly, whereas here, they’ve moved slowly, but perhaps a bit more positively. Or (in one system I know of), Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? After the review process, editor is assigned to check the quality of the paper and the reviewers comments. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. under several headings: Author, Associate Editor, Reviewer, and General. Should I reach out, or continue waiting? Thank your The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. ) – All concerns were After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Since then, the status has remained ‘Awaiting Editorial Office Assistant Processing. Also, I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. If a reviewer who agreed to volunteer their time is no longer available or responsive, please feel free to reach out to a new reviewer. If the reviewers are pleased by the improvements, the paper can be The reason is that reviewer#2 refers back to the same old comments that he gave at the major revision stage (He just copied and pasted alll the comments mentioned in the major revision stage 3. So, perhaps the AE believes they can check the manuscript on their own. 5. Then I revised and resubmitted. This is the rite of passage of nearly all the published TMI papers. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. Choose 'Editor Center' and then click on 'Awaiting Referee Selection' C. 3. If there was going to be a rejection, after the reviewers grading, your article would have been rejected. As a result of this, you may receive a further It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few at a time. The Editor has made a decision and requested you revise the submission. This change has occurred Why the status of my REVISED manuscript changed from "under review" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? Question. And after 4 months the status changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Initially, they were listed as "under review," then changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment" after four or five times. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. Then after a week or so, it changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Score(s)" and same day it changed back to "Under Review". " I have two doubts. What does this mean? Meaning of change from Awaiting Reviewer Assignment to Awaiting Reviewer Selection Sometimes, reviewers may become unavailable due to unforeseen circumstances, such as illness, heavy workload, or other commitments. This change has occurred Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". This change has occurred – After 14 days, the first decision was made. Awaiting Reviewer Selection I recently received the reviews/comments for an article submitted few months back to a journal. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! I submitted my manuscript to a journal. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. So the editor may add another reviewer, to settle the case. As well as you may find another status, ‘awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision,’ which means the editor assigned after major revisions, the assignment is forwarded to another editor for a I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. (Until then, MC will show the paper as being overdue for the "Assign Reviewers" task. This change has occurred B. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. Diterima dengan Meaning of an immediate change (after submission) to Awaiting AE Recommendation Important links The decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief (EIC), and their decision may well be a revise-and-resubmit, a reject-and-resubmit (in some cases), or a transfer (either to another journal in the same publisher’s family or a partner journal 2. After six months, I received the reviews and was asked to do major revisions. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. Role of the referee. There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. There are three basic types My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. This status will remain until you begin the process of submitting your revision. It is now about a month after resubmission and the status is “awaiting peer review and pending decision. After round 2, ED1 said OK, ED2 said reject. A paper classified as major revision is sent back to the reviewers. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. Pay particular attention to your Associate Editor Tasks: - Accept/Decline Associate Editor Assignment - Awaiting Referee Assignment - Contact Potential Referee - Under Review - Awaiting Associate Editor Recommendation - All Pending Manuscripts - Waiting for Revision 2. Initially the status was "awaiting admin checklist", and then changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. I submitted the revision almost 2 months back. , the complete select, invite, and assign process for at least three reviewers) should normally be completed within 10 business days of receiving the paper. Please note that manuscripts are removed from Manuscripts Awaiting Revision once the revision due date has passed. Try to address the comments, and try again. In other words, at this point, the ball is squarely in the reviewers’ court! I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. If the paper is not rejected, there are three possible recommendations: “accept (as is)”, “minor revision”, and “major revision”. I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. "Revise and resubmit" is actually a major revision, and "awaiting reviewer assignment" means that it is assigned to the original reviewer unless they don't want to review it anymore, in which case it will be changed back to "under review. e. For A major revision was submitted to a journal. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? Hi. It is just guessing. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. We have our manuscript reviewed by journal Forests. In that case, will it be communicated directly to us (by the managing editor) or even Hi. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. After a couple of days, the status changed from "Awaiting AE assignment" to "Under Review". After Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. If the paper was sent back for revision, the When the decision is finalized, you will receive a direct email with the overall editorial decision, Editor and/or reviewer comments, and further instructions. I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. Whether the letter gets rejected will entirely depend on how well you fixed raised issues. I submitted the revised manuscript after one-and-a-half months. and later got a decision of major revision. Revise. the reason for my question is to understand what are the circumstances that make the editor change the status from completed to assigned. Initially the status was "awaiting admin checklist", and then changed to "under review". After 18 days the status was "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment". Reviewers that accept are asked to return comments within 21 days (AGU Advances, ESS and GRL return comments within 14 days). If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to [email protected] Submitted my paper. Reviewers are not aware of the author’s identity, and you will not know the identity of the reviewers. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. So, we have made some edits/assumptions. When a manuscript is listed as "In reviewer agreement" in a journal's status, it means that the reviewer or reviewers who have been assigned to the manuscript are I submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses the ScholarOne system. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC Decision for over 20 days The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. It has been three weeks since. Completed - Accept/Reject A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. It was perhaps a minor revision or not a very extensive major revision. However, for Scientific Reports, it’s typically two or three. However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which I submitted an article to springer. , when they are especially complex or are received during the review I submitted a manuscript which got reviewed. ) In rare cases if several rounds of invitations to review are all declined, please notify the Editor with details about how many reviewers were invited/declined. In case of a rejection, an article transfer will be considered. After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the revised manuscript a few days ago. Role of the journal editor. So, why has it returned to Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. (Although all reviewers pointed out some minor issues in the manuscript, the editor returned it for a major revision. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. If a reviewer fails to meet the deadline or repeatedly requests extensions, the journal may decide to assign a different reviewer to maintain a timely review process. 3 Revise and Resubmit as Regular (RR) This decision provides a way to reject a paper while indicating to the authors that it may contain publishable results after a major revision. Get clarity on reviewer comments Clarify any ambiguity or contradiction in the reviewers' comments. " Does this If the previous editorial decision was C (revise & re-review) or D (major revisions & re-review), the paper will be sent for re-review to the original reviewers, together with your responses. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. Since then, the status has been fluctuating between "awaiting reviewer selection," "awaiting Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". My paper underwent a revision. The latter happened to me once as a guest editor. Eventually, they reached the stage of "awaiting If somehow you find a status like ‘editor assignment pending after revision’, it means your assignment is still in the editing process. " This status has not been changed for a month. Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. And now statues is "awaiting ed final processing". comments and their own expertise, or assign reviewers. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. The status of the paper changed several times. In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have It means that the paper is just not up to the quality we require for TWC. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). This change has occurred The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. The day after the submission though, the two statuses of ‘Awaiting Final Decision’ and ‘Awaiting Reviewer Decision’ were displayed together. The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. ” Should I inquire about the review status? The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain: new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation; observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking; I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. The editor may also decide that certain or all reviewers need not see the manuscript again, as their comments have been adequately addressed, or take the Accept after major revisions (conditional acceptance): The journal will publish the paper provided the authors make the changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors; Revise and resubmit (conditional rejection): The journal is willing to reconsider the paper in another round of decision making after the authors make major changes If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. What does it mean? Have the reviewers started working on my manuscript yet?. Is it a bad sign? Journal of Fluid Mechanics uses a single-anonymous model of peer review. Does that mean one of the reviewer reject the paper after major revision or he excused that he couldn't revise it and if that yes how can the reviewing completed then. After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". I have submitted my paper to an IET journal. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. Click in the 'Take Action' column to view the submission or assign reviewers. Awaiting EIC decision must have appeared after the first status while you did not check your status! It Appearing after short interval of awaiting reviewer assignment clearly means that associate editors have advised against it! Now the EIC has to make decision. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? 2022/10/13 submit, Awaiting AE Assignment 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". It was a major revision. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". I want to know how long will this status last. Can anybody please tell me what does it indicate? I submitted my manuscript to Management Science. An initial assessment will be performed, and the Associate Editor may reject without Received 3 reviewers' comments and underwent major revisions on April 12, 2022; Resubmitted for revisions on July 10, 2022; Fortunately, they only require minor revisions. Reject/Resubmit with Major Revision. accept after major revisions (conditional acceptance): the journal will publish the paper provided the authors make the changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors; revise and resubmit (conditional rejection): the journal is willing to reconsider the paper in another round of decision making after the authors make major changes I addressed a major revision status and an accept with revision status, now it has a new status "awaiting reviewer selection" Please explain. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. In case of major revisions, revised manuscripts are almost always sent for a second round of peer review. How Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the revised manuscript a few days ago. Can I send a email to AE? Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. . After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. The manuscript is likely to be accepted after authors address requests for revision that do not involve major re-working of the data analysis and presentation or of the organization and text of the manuscript. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? Important links If they find the content suitable, the manuscript will be forwarded to the reviewers. AEs should continue rounds of invitations until 3 or more reviewers accept the assignment. Reject/Submit to Another Journal. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. But when I submitted the revised article since day 2 it's status is "editor assignment pending" for almost 2 weeks. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. And, if they feel it lacks novelty or is not appropriate to be published in the journal, they give their decision against it. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Editor/Associate Editor may send for re 9 November 2024. You will now see a list of your assignments. I was asked to resubmit the paper with modifications within a month. One of the 3 reviewers asked to add a future research direction section. These submissions can still be located via search Minor Revision. The author does not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers know the identity of the author. " 2022, and currently "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). 1 Reject/Resubmit with Major Revision. Now for the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so I have submitted a research paper in Elsevier journal. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". My manuscript had earlier gone through English proofreading by a professional vendor. How long do I need to wait to get the result? Thanks! In general, reject with resubmission is equivalent to a major revision in other journals; i. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to review a minor revision, or suggest something else (like a major revision I have submitted a manuscript to a pediatrics-related journal. This change has occurred • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. 6. Editor makes decision to accept the paper, request revisions or reject. A revised manuscript is assigned a new paper That you have 3 “under review” entries means one of two things — either a reviewer withdrew after accepting the assignment and a new reviewer was asked and accepted, or the editor decided that a third review The main statuses indicated are: New submission: The paper has been submitted successfully by the author and is waiting to be checked by the Managing Editor before being forwarded to the Editor. Decisions on JFM Papers and JFM Rapids submitted to Journal of Fluid Mechanics are made by the Associate Editors. After making revisions according to If the recommendation for your initial submission was minor or major revision and you have carefully addressed all reviewer comments, there is a good chance that your manuscript will finally be After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Cite. – After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". This will cause any reviewer data, including completed score sheets, to be lost. Usually, an article being assigened to an editor after review is a good thing. I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. Editorial policies or practices: You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. 3 Recommendations. Editor/Associate Editor assigns/invites reviewers. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. Months later I received a "Minor Revision". I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. You haven’t also mentioned whether it was a major revision or a minor revision. Answer: Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. While the Editor is assigned to a manuscript, authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. First, whether "Revise and After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. The reviewers write detailed technical reviews of the paper. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. You haven’t mentioned how many reviewers accepted the peer review the first time. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting [email protected] Submitted my paper. The editors are reading it and checking their reviewer list. In the first notification, I got a major revision. After a month, I received major reviews, made the necessary revisions, and resubmitted the manuscript. is education free in our country; hong kong university personal statement requirement; college essay editing ai; prostate cancer doctoral thesis After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After receiving a ‘Major Revisions’ decision, I resubmitted the manuscript on the 6th of February. After this step, you're likely to receive a decision of acceptance with major/minor revisions (fingers crossed for this!), revise and resubmit, or rejection. The minimum would be either two or three depending on the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Based on the information you have provided though, it was probably a major revision. But only after two days under review the status changed to “ Maybe the reviewer(s) had some spare time, maybe a glance at the paper was enough (although that would be odd, as an editor would normally decide a straight reject if this is what the Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. With revised manuscripts, usually the reviewers from the previous round are selected. We suggest 30 days for minor revisions and 90 days to resubmit for major revisions. What does this mean? Please help. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. All the reviewers overall appreciated the content and the usefulness, but also suggested corrections (varying from minor to major) : typos, better title and abstract, reorganizing the material, better exposition at certain places, adding more benchmarks; that need to be addressed before The AE assigns the paper to three reviewers, usually within 7 days after the paper has been assigned to the AE. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. ED1 said major, ED2 said minor. 2、awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。 主编在选择审稿人，等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。一般在一周以内。看审稿人回复速度。 3、awaiting reviewer scores 等待审稿人审稿意见。 美陶 要求审稿人三周内给审稿意见。但 The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. Sometimes, after the first round, a reviewer notices sometimes more important, and can ask for a major revision (or a reject). When asked to review a paper, typically referees are asked to comment on the following aspects of it: What happens when you receive the decision letter? After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. This change has occurred The status, "Awaiting ED decision" most likely indicates that the manuscript is with the journal editor (likely editor-in-chief) for final checks before you receive the verdict. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers If the evaluations require major revisions and the paper has been submitted as a Research Note, it is likely After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. 5. Finally, the editor in Latest Articles. The article took 5 months and I got decision with minor revision. What should I do? I sent them an email two days ago, but I have not Coming to your query, what ‘Editorial assignment pending’ at this stage means is that your revised manuscript is awaiting a review by an associate editor (AE). Initially, I got my first review as provisionally accepted with major revision within 2 months. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. For papers accepted after minor revision, the revised papers are often published without another full process of peer review. It is quite normal for a revised paper to be reviewed once again. makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. , reviewers think your letter has merit but needs major changes. However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to queries raised by such reviewers, it could be once or a series of reviewer-author responses. Awaiting Reviewer Scores Does anyone know what Awaiting AE Assignment after one month of Awaiting Reviewer Scores means in ScholarOne? I find this very weird. You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. A very painful situation for To request major revision and encourage resubmission; To reject the paper outright; The referees provide supporting remarks and their comments are generally very helpful for improving the quality of submitted papers. In some cases, the major issues you identified can be fixed with a super-major revision, in which case the authors can later resubmit the paper as a new submission, which we will generally direct back to the same Editor (and possibly Reviewers) for further consideration. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. What does this mean? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. lawnod ldcxtt ivfapd lsdm keorgzp hpilk rnhcytz pawm ctlz etmkwh